vendredi 15 avril 2022

A Little Life

""5""/5. 

I highly recommend leaving this book alone.

Short version: it's like watching Requiem for a Dream, but instead of the story crescendoing in 2 hours, it just keeps going, darker and more devastating.


I will avoid mentioning any details about the story itself or the characters, and instead, I will just review the process of reading [book:A Little Life|22822858].

Goodreads gives its rating scale the following labels: “1: did not like it”, “2: it was ok”, “3: liked it”, “4: really like it”, and “5: it was amazing”. After finishing this book and sitting on it for a while, I couldn’t rate it on this scale. None of the labels really resonated with the experience of reading it.


On one hand, the book is excellently written. The roster of characters is rich and they are individually well fleshed out, each with their own motivations, their own calling, their own demons. The narration is so rich in detail about their passions (art, architecture, cooking, law, mathematics..) that it quickly tricks you into believing in their existence, into caring about them. The prose is beautiful, painfully so at times. There is a deceitful warmth in the way small moments are tenderly and exquisitely told that it may lull you into believing that everything will be alright in the end. The writing in general is almost good enough to be worth the price of admission alone.


On the other hand, I <b>hated</b> reading this book. 

I don’t believe that every book should be “enjoyable” to read ‒some of the most edifying reading experiences I had were about those corners of human experiences that are uncomfortable, even vile and unhinged‒ but boy, does this book feel like an exercise in sadomasochism: masochism because reading some of the passages feels physically and mentally painful, and sadism because you keep reading still, almost knowing with some guilty assurance that the pain isn’t going to stop any soon.

[author:Hanya Yanagihara|6571447] spent the 700 pages of this book being a malevolent god: she taketh as soon as she giveth. Although she positions each of her characters somewhat obviously on the Good-Bad spectrum, letting you develop empathy for the good ones, every single one of them suffers. And suffers again. Especially the most vulnerable ones. And when you think they may get a second chance ‒a little life, one might say‒, they suffer some more. There is no light, just the tunnel. No retribution, no respite, and absolutely no catharsis. 


I started reading <i>A Little Life</i> because I wanted to read a novel about friendship, as there aren’t sadly many of those around. And while the novel starts there, exploring a beautiful friendship for 4 boys coming from different walks of life, it morphs into a psychologically rich exploration of the concept of belonging, of pain, of worthiness, of unredeemable destruction. The internal monologues of each character uncoiling their trauma, especially as the book progresses, are all written in sublime pathos, which made it so uncomfortably relatable that I started wondering if reading more would make it rub more deeply into my soul, never to be cleaned again.


While I hated the experience of reading this, I cannot say that I regret it. I know I will never read it again, and I will never recommend it to anyone. But like one of those realistic nightmares that weaves itself into your waking life, I don’t see myself forgetting about it any time soon.

Catch-22

 This is one of those rare books that introduced a concept that is used in common parlance. A "catch-22" is, according to Wikipedia "paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules or limitations". 

Without giving much away, this book relishes in amping up the tickling sensation you get from grinding your brain on the edge of a paradox. One may think that it will run out of ways to make use of the concept, it only get better as one reads on. 

While there is so much fun to be had of the many absurd paradoxes the characters of the book bring up (and usually accept in resignation), the true joy of reading Catch-22 comes from its highly memorable characters roster of varying questionable sanity, the names of which make up the titles of most chapters. So much hilarity ensues from their absurd and whimsical existences. I don't think I will ever forget Milo, Major Major (his introduction was one of the funniest things I've ever read), the chaplain, and definitely not Yossarian, who is the heart of an otherwise purely absurd exercice in trying -and intentionally failing- to make sense of the toils and trappings of war. 


While the tone-perfect humor is the biggest selling point of this little novel, what elevates it to a Classic are the little moments where Heller chooses not to be funny: the stark contrast making so strong a point that it rivals other serious anti-war novels in depth and impact. This is book is also infinitely quotable, and what it lacks in "character development" more than makes up for in deftness of narration, description, dialog, and characterization. 


5/5. Perfect, absolute madness.